VisiLean · PMO Control Tower

Capital projects — India

Pune, Maharashtra + Hyderabad, Telangana · Phase 1, 18 months
Client logo
Status date 15 Sep 2026 Overall Amber Forecast finish 14 Nov 2027 vs 30 Oct 2027 commitment +15 days Illustrative data
Portfolio — all locations India-wide view across every project in the portfolio — industrial, commercial, healthcare, infrastructure and data centre. Pune and Hyderabad are live on the Control Tower today; the remaining locations are shown as pipeline projects with illustrative figures, pending confirmation of scope and timing.
India — All Project Locations
Progress by Location — Actual vs Plan (%)
Location Detail

Actions needed

Major delays

What’s going right

What’s going wrong

Pune & Hyderabad — Site Locations
Overall S-Curve — Baseline vs Planned vs Actual
Status at a Glance — Every Dimension in One View
Milestone Scoreboard — Next 4
MilestoneBaselineForecastStatus
AmberForecast finish 14 Nov 2027 — 15 working days past the 30 Oct 2027 commitment
Work done 32.4% against 41.8% planned by now. The delay is driven by a design revision hold on Zone A (Pune) and long-lead chiller package delivery slipping to Dec 2026. Civil works at Pune are 46 days behind baseline due to monsoon impact and late piling start. Environmental Clearance / Consent to Establish (SPCB) is on the critical path.
14 Nov '27
Forecast Finish
+15d vs commitment
32.4%
Work Done vs Planned
Plan: 41.8% · Behind plan
4 / 14
Milestones Met
3 at risk · 7 upcoming
7
Open Constraints
2 critical · 3 high
Forecast Finish Trend — Monthly Schedule Reviews
Each point is that month's re-forecast of the finish date, shown as days early/late vs the 30 Oct 2027 committed date (dashed line = 0 = on time). Feb–May'26: slippage grew as design revision holds cascaded. Jun'26: a recovery plan (resequenced civil works) briefly closed the gap. Jul'26 onward: new risks (SPCB clearance, procurement delays) pushed the forecast out again to the current +15d.
Work Done vs Planned — % of Project
Driving the Delay
Primary delay driver
Design Revision Hold — Zone A

Rev 3 not issued. Foundation design cannot be finalised. 14 activities on hold. Civil works cascade delay: ~3 weeks.

CRITICAL   Owner: Client / Design Consultant   Overdue: 16 days
Sets the end date
Environmental Clearance / CTE (SPCB)

Consent to Establish pending with the State Pollution Control Board. Construction halt risk if not received by Oct 2026. Currently on critical path.

HIGH   Owner: Client — Approvals   Target: 30 Sep 2026
Procurement risk
Chiller Package Delivery — Dec 2026

Long-lead plant delayed by 8 weeks. Zone B installation sequence blocked until the chillers land on site.

HIGH   Owner: PMC Procurement   Impact: Zone B start
What Changed — Last 2 Weeks (1 Sep → 15 Sep 2026)
Milestone Movements — 5 biggest slips
MilestoneGroupWasNowSlip
Complete Foundations — Pune Zone AConstruction Milestones15 Aug 202630 Sep 2026+46d late
Environmental Clearance / CTE (SPCB)Regulatory Milestones01 Sep 202631 Oct 2026+60d late
Major PO Placement (>80% value)Procurement Milestones31 May 202630 Jun 2026+30d late
Design Freeze — Zones A & BDesign Milestones30 Apr 202615 May 2026+15d late
Equipment Installation Start — PuneConstruction Milestones15 Nov 202615 Jan 2027+61d late
14 Nov 2027
Forecast Finish
+15 days vs 30 Oct commitment
4 / 14
Milestones Met
3 At Risk · 7 Not Started
32.4%
Overall Progress
Plan: 41.8%
Overall S-Curve — Baseline vs Planned vs Actual vs Forecast Site photos
RAG Zone — Schedule Variance by Discipline
Milestone Scoreboard
IDMilestoneBaselineForecastVariance (days)Status
Weekly Quantity-Based Tracking — Scope vs Planned vs Actual vs Balance Quantities tracked at activity level — each row shows total scope, planned cumulative, actual achieved, and balance remaining. Updated weekly by VisiLean PMO from site DPRs. RAG auto-computed against planned-till-date: Green only if actual is at/above plan · up to 5% behind = Amber · more than 5% behind = Red. (Unlike schedule-variance RAG elsewhere, any quantity shortfall is never Green.)
Quantity Tracker — All Sites
SiteAreaDisciplineUoM ScopePlanned Qty (till date)Actual QtyBalance Planned till date %Actual %Variance SkilledUnskilledRAG
Weekly Liquidation Profile — Planned vs Actual per Discipline Each chart shows weekly planned increment and actual progress for a discipline. Cumulative S-curve overlaid. Data updated every Monday from previous week's DPRs. Missing bars indicate weeks with no data yet submitted.
Weekly Liquidation — Civil
All Disciplines — Cumulative Progress %
Recovery Required — Portfolio S-Curve
What It Takes To Still Hit 30 Oct 2027 The bold red line below is the run-rate the whole programme needs to hold from now on to close the gap to the committed date — not a system forecast, but the plan VisiLean's planners build by hand: re-sequencing activities and resetting quantity assumptions week by week in the New Table View until the curve closes. VisiLean does not auto-level resources against the plan; this line moves only when a planner moves it.
Cumulative % Complete — Actual vs Recovery Rate Required
Weekly Summary Table — All Disciplines
Discipline Total Scope Planned This Week Actual This Week Variance Cum Planned % Cum Actual % Cum Variance Rate Needed to Recover RAG
Productivity-Based Planning — Run Rate vs Required Rate Since all contracts are unit-rate (no resource-loaded schedules), productivity is computed from: Actual Qty completed ÷ Workers deployed = daily run rate. Asking Rate = remaining scope ÷ remaining calendar days. Red = asking rate >2× actual rate.
Run Rate vs Planned Rate vs Asking Rate (% scope/week)
Workers on Site — Daily Average by Discipline
Are We Building Fast Enough?
Phase / DisciplineDonePlan (till date)Done/Plan Actual Rate (last 4 wks)Planned RateAsking Rate Workers (avg)Step-up NeededRAG
Design Deliverables Tracker — Key Deliverables Only Tracked at deliverable type level (not individual drawing numbers). Stages: Not Started → IFA (Issued for Approval) → Client Comments → IFC (Issued for Construction) → Approved. Each deliverable type tracked against baseline and forecast completion.
10
Deliverable Types Tracked
72.4%
Overall Design % Done
Plan: 85.2%
28
Open Design Review Actions
Blocking IFC for Zone C
3
Deliverables On Hold
Design Progress by Deliverable Type
IFA vs IFC vs Approved — Count by Type
Design Deliverables Register — Planned-till-date vs Actual, Gap Visible
Deliverable TypeTotal DocsIssued (IFA) Approved (IFC)On Hold Planned Qty (till date)Actual Qty / %Gap BaselineForecastStatus
Knock-on Effect — Delay Propagation Across Dependent Deliverables
Deliverables are logically dependent — a delay upstream (e.g. concept design not yet frozen) puts every downstream deliverable that relies on it at risk, even where the downstream team has continued drafting on a preliminary basis.
Deep-Dive Construction Tracker — WBS/Activity-Level Progress, Delay Q&A Civil and structural construction activities tracked at WBS/activity level with baseline vs forecast completion. Where an activity is delayed, the planner logs the delay reason, the responsible party, and the expected resolution — this view drives the weekly review meeting.
Activity Gantt — Baseline vs Forecast
Constraint / Delay Log — Planner Q&A
WBS / ActivitySiteDiscipline Baseline FinishForecast Finish% Complete DelayDelay ReasonResponsible Party Expected ResolutionStatus
Procurement Tagged Item Tracker — PO Placed → Lead Period → Material Delivered → Erected Each equipment category tracked through 4 lifecycle stages, quantity-first: count of tags reached vs the count that should have been reached by now (Planned-till-date), so the gap — and therefore the RAG — is self-explanatory. Modelled on LLE (Long Lead Equipment) methodology.
Procurement Pipeline — Category Summary (Quantity → Percentage → Planned-till-date → Gap)
Equipment CategoryTotal Tags PO Placed — Qty (Actual% / Plan%) Material Delivered — Qty (Actual% / Plan%) Gap vs Plan (units) Erected — Qty (%)RAG
Drill-down — choose a category
Tagged Item Detail
Tag No.DescriptionStage PO PlacedLead Period Ends (Plan) Delivery PlanDelivery Actual / Forecast Erection PlanDelay (days)RAG
Constraints & Action Register — Daily DPR Actions + Weekly Review Actions Actions arising from DPRs and meetings are logged here with owner, target date, and linked activities. MoM documentation is managed by the PMC externally; action closure status is updated in VisiLean weekly.
2
Critical
3
High
1
Committed
Constraints by Category
Action Closure Trend
Open Constraints — Priority List
#IDTypeConstraint TitleArea RaisedTargetHolds / Impact OwnerStatusPriority
Work Fronts — Phase Status & Rate Needed to Recover Each construction phase on its own terms: how much of the project it carries, how much is built, what is running, and the rate needed to recover the committed finish date.
Phase Progress — Done vs Planned (%)
Critical Activities by Phase
Work Fronts Summary
PhaseActivities% ScopeDone % Planned till date %Done / PlanOpenCritical Past BaselineRate Needed